<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.0.2" -->
<rss version="2.0" 
    xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd" 
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: AI vs. IF</title>
	<link>http://writerresponsetheory.org/wordpress/2004/12/13/ai-vs-if/</link>
	<description>a blog and podcast dedicated to discussing text arts forms</description>
	<pubDate>Sat, 22 Nov 2008 09:15:46 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.0.2</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	
	 <copyright>Writer Response Theory 2004-2005</copyright>
    <managingEditor>wrt@writerresponsetheory.org (Writer Response Theory)</managingEditor>
    <webMaster>wrt@writerresponsetheory.org</webMaster>

    <category>Talk Radio</category>
   <itunes:category text="Arts &amp; Entertainment" ><itunes:category text="Entertainment" />
</itunes:category>
<itunes:category text="Education" ><itunes:category text="Higher Education" />
</itunes:category>
<itunes:category text="Technology" ><itunes:category text="Developers" />
</itunes:category>
	
    <itunes:subtitle>Comment-cast: AI vs. IF</itunes:subtitle>
    <itunes:summary>Comment-cast: AI vs. IF</itunes:summary>
    
    <itunes:author>Writer Response Theory</itunes:author>    
    <itunes:owner>
        <itunes:name>Writer Response Theory</itunes:name>
        <itunes:email>wrt@writerresponsetheory.org</itunes:email>
    </itunes:owner>
    
    <itunes:image href="http://writerresponsetheory.org/wordpress/wp-content/uploads/iTWRTl.JPG" />
    

	<item>
		<title>by: Christy Dena</title>
		<link>http://writerresponsetheory.org/wordpress/2004/12/13/ai-vs-if/#comment-12</link>
		<pubDate>Tue, 30 Nov 1999 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://writerresponsetheory.org/wordpress/2004/12/13/ai-vs-if/#comment-12</guid>
					<description>Andrew,&lt;br /&gt;
Their server must of been down when you tried. It works for me now. The full URL is: http://www.chatterboxchallenge.com/article_pirner.html&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
If you still have problems let me know and I'll email the text. :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Andrew,<br />
Their server must of been down when you tried. It works for me now. The full URL is: <a href='http://www.chatterboxchallenge.com/article_pirner.html' rel='nofollow'>http://www.chatterboxchallenge.com/article_pirner.html</a></p>
<p>If you still have problems let me know and I&#8217;ll email the text. :)
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			                <itunes:author>Christy Dena</itunes:author>
        <itunes:subtitle>Andrew,
Their server must of been down when you tried. It works for me now. The full URL is: http://www.chatterboxchallenge.com/article_pirner.html

If you ...</itunes:subtitle>
        <itunes:summary>Andrew,
Their server must of been down when you tried. It works for me now. The full URL is: http://www.chatterboxchallenge.com/article_pirner.html

If you ...</itunes:summary>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: andrew stern</title>
		<link>http://writerresponsetheory.org/wordpress/2004/12/13/ai-vs-if/#comment-11</link>
		<pubDate>Tue, 30 Nov 1999 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://writerresponsetheory.org/wordpress/2004/12/13/ai-vs-if/#comment-11</guid>
					<description>The link to that paper seems to be broken.  I'd like to read the paper; has anyone saved a copy of the text?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The link to that paper seems to be broken.  I&#8217;d like to read the paper; has anyone saved a copy of the text?
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			                <itunes:author>andrew stern</itunes:author>
        <itunes:subtitle>The link to that paper seems to be broken.  I'd like to read the paper; has anyone saved a ...</itunes:subtitle>
        <itunes:summary>The link to that paper seems to be broken.  I'd like to read the paper; has anyone saved a ...</itunes:summary>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Christy Dena</title>
		<link>http://writerresponsetheory.org/wordpress/2004/12/13/ai-vs-if/#comment-10</link>
		<pubDate>Tue, 30 Nov 1999 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://writerresponsetheory.org/wordpress/2004/12/13/ai-vs-if/#comment-10</guid>
					<description>I like the way he links the begins of IF and chatterbots together. I guess the difference is one, a game, speaks as an omniscient narrator, more appropriately as an heterodiegetic narrator; whereas the other, a bot, is homodiegetic. A bot is purely a 'monologism' but with the inclusion of the 'interactor' or client or whatever it becomes polyphonic. How many bots have you seen with multiple-personalities? An IF, however, has the voice of the machine in a sense, and can include other voices... I think voice is a big difference between the two. What do you think?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I like the way he links the begins of IF and chatterbots together. I guess the difference is one, a game, speaks as an omniscient narrator, more appropriately as an heterodiegetic narrator; whereas the other, a bot, is homodiegetic. A bot is purely a &#8216;monologism&#8217; but with the inclusion of the &#8216;interactor&#8217; or client or whatever it becomes polyphonic. How many bots have you seen with multiple-personalities? An IF, however, has the voice of the machine in a sense, and can include other voices&#8230; I think voice is a big difference between the two. What do you think?
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			                <itunes:author>Christy Dena</itunes:author>
        <itunes:subtitle>I like the way he links the begins of IF and chatterbots together. I guess the difference is one, a ...</itunes:subtitle>
        <itunes:summary>I like the way he links the begins of IF and chatterbots together. I guess the difference is one, a ...</itunes:summary>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
