Strict Standards: Non-static method installk2::installer() should not be called statically in /home/writerresponse/writerresponsetheory.org/wordpress/wp-content/themes/3k2w-b2r344/functions.php on line 23

Warning: Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /home/writerresponse/writerresponsetheory.org/wordpress/wp-content/themes/3k2w-b2r344/functions.php:23) in /home/writerresponse/writerresponsetheory.org/wordpress/wp-commentsrss2.php on line 15
Comments on: Mistaken for Machine: Generated vs. Authored Text http://writerresponsetheory.org/wordpress/2005/02/17/mistaken-for-machine-generated-vs-authored-text/ a blog and podcast dedicated to discussing text arts forms Sun, 19 Nov 2017 08:30:25 +0000 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.0.2 en Writer Response Theory 2004-2005 wrt@writerresponsetheory.org (Writer Response Theory) wrt@writerresponsetheory.org Talk Radio Comment-cast: Mistaken for Machine: Generated vs. Authored Text Comment-cast: Mistaken for Machine: Generated vs. Authored Text Writer Response Theory Writer Response Theory wrt@writerresponsetheory.org http://writerresponsetheory.org/wordpress/wp-content/uploads/iTWRT.JPG WRT: Writer Response Theory http://writerresponsetheory.org/wordpress 144 144 by: #social_victim_meat# http://writerresponsetheory.org/wordpress/2005/02/17/mistaken-for-machine-generated-vs-authored-text/#comment-174 Sun, 05 Jun 2005 21:53:22 +0000 http://writerresponsetheory.org/wordpress/2005/02/17/mistaken-for-machine-generated-vs-authored-text/#comment-174 #! /usr/bin/dreamaul #[dream. exe.cut(my.cog.knitive.veins)ion. knot.via. the cere(s).bellum but by ur.(7)hell #this dream can.knot.be.closed _de.b[r]ug[er], pls_ -- _______________________________________________________ Part1 - Part2 - Part3 - Part4 - Part5 - Part6 - Part7 - Single ASoC_Load _______________________________________________________ >Pique::Single ASoC_Load_ _ _ Top Document: Maulage- F[D]re[am]quently Asked Questions [ Cognitive_vein_dream_imagery F[D]AQs | Search | Web FAQs | Documents | Index ] ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- _How.do.I.Remove.DreamSubConscEmbed??_ ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 1.1) _how.du.i.remove.dreamSubConscEmbed??_ Figure [in+blood.x-plosive].this.out[riddle.me.with.[l]it[erary]chy.this] Some.ebony.linear.ash.h[m]ea[ning]d.imagery.will.stick Rash.urself.[with]in.buttered_an[g.lee]xiety Way.2.vividly.named.2.file.under.>>stop_that!file Deprecated: preg_replace(): The /e modifier is deprecated, use preg_replace_callback instead in /home/writerresponse/writerresponsetheory.org/wordpress/wp-includes/functions-formatting.php on line 76

#! /usr/bin/dreamaul
#[dream. exe.cut(my.cog.knitive.veins)ion. knot.via. the cere(s).bellum but by ur.(7)hell
#this dream can.knot.be.closed

_de.b[r]ug[er], pls_

_______________________________________________________

Part1 - Part2 - Part3 - Part4 - Part5 - Part6 - Part7 - Single ASoC_Load
_______________________________________________________

>Pique::Single ASoC_Load_

_

_

Top Document: Maulage- F[D]re[am]quently Asked Questions

[ Cognitive_vein_dream_imagery F[D]AQs | Search | Web FAQs | Documents | Index ]

———————————————————————————————–

_How.do.I.Remove.DreamSubConscEmbed??_

———————————————————————————————–

1.1) _how.du.i.remove.dreamSubConscEmbed??_

Figure [in+blood.x-plosive].this.out[riddle.me.with.[l]it[erary]chy.this]
Some.ebony.linear.ash.h[m]ea[ning]d.imagery.will.stick
Rash.urself.[with]in.buttered_an[g.lee]xiety
Way.2.vividly.named.2.file.under.>>stop_that!file

]]>
#social_victim_meat# #! /usr/bin/dreamaul #[dream. exe.cut(my.cog.knitive.veins)ion. knot.via. the cere(s).bellum but by ur.(7)hell #this dream can.knot.be.closed _de.b[r]ug[er], pls_ -- _______________________________________________________ Part1 - Part2 - Part3 - Part4 - ... #! /usr/bin/dreamaul #[dream. exe.cut(my.cog.knitive.veins)ion. knot.via. the cere(s).bellum but by ur.(7)hell #this dream can.knot.be.closed _de.b[r]ug[er], pls_ -- _______________________________________________________ Part1 - Part2 - Part3 - Part4 - ...
by: Christy Dena http://writerresponsetheory.org/wordpress/2005/02/17/mistaken-for-machine-generated-vs-authored-text/#comment-13 Tue, 30 Nov 1999 00:00:00 +0000 http://writerresponsetheory.org/wordpress/2005/02/17/mistaken-for-machine-generated-vs-authored-text/#comment-13 Interesting situation. Poor girl. Isn't that the worst insult?: <em>"Your thoughts are akin to that of a freely-downloadable simple-reflex program."</em> But really, how many people do react to everyday events with robot precision? Many. That is one of the appeals of bots for me: they perform the self-obsessed unchanging one-dimensional dependant person so well (among other characters). A character from the code out. Simple responses to life and random, unclear and disjointed thoughts are not the domain of bots alone. So, back to your pertinent questions:<br /> <br /> <blockquote>How does one writes like a bot - how does one avoid it?<br /> <br /> What does the potential for confusion do to us when we are writers in a social space such as a weblog or IM?</blockquote><br /> <br /> I don't think this is a problem for IM since the ping factor ? users can tell if a bot is online because of the amount of ?pings? [there's a paper on this but I can't recall the title, author or find it right now?]. <br /> <br /> The question of interest to me as a bot master is that of ?how does one avoid writing like a bot??. By ?writing? I don't mean the natural language in isolation but also the construction of the pattern-matching or whatever system I employ. A fascinating paper by Phoebe Sengers parallels current agent behaviour with that of schizophrenic patients. Agents, she argues, exhibit the ?fragmented, depersonalized behaviour? (427). The ?fundamental problem for both schizophrenic patients and agents is that observers have difficulty understanding them narratively? (ibid.). Sengers blames this agent state on the methodologies employed by designers:<br /> <br /> <blockquote>Generally speaking, an agent's behavior consists of short dalliances in individual behaviors with abrupt changes between them. It is this overall defective nature of agent behavior, caused by underintegration of behavioral units, that I term 'schizophrenia' and address here.</blockquote><br /> <br /> In order to facilitate comprehension then Sengers proposes ?socially situated AI?: where the social and cultural environment of the agent are design factors. She outlines three principles that distinguish this approach from others:<br /> <br /> <blockquote><ul><li>1. An agent can only be evaluated with respect to its environment, which includes not only the objects with which it interacts, but also the creators and observers of the agent.?</li> <li>2. An agent?s design should focus, not on the agent itself, but on the dynamics of that agent with respect to its physical and social environments.</li> <li>3. An agent is a representation. Artificial agents are a mirror of their creators? understanding of what it means to be at once mechanical and human, intelligent, alive?what cultural theorists call a subject?This means in a fundamental sense that, in our agents, we are not creating life but representing it, in ways that make sense to us, given our specific cultural backgrounds.</li></ul></blockquote> (430)<br /> <img src="/wordpress/wp-content/uploads/SENGERS_SocialAI_02.jpg" width="238" alt="Sengers cartoon from her paper" /> Sengers has developed therefore a "narrative agent architecture" based on narrative psychology and AI theory, the Expressivator, to develop the architecture to actuate these principles. They are explained as: <blockquote><ul><li>1. Context sensitivity and negotiability: [?]In order to design narratively expressive agents, designers must respect (rather than attempt to override) the context- and audience dependency of narrative comprehension.</li> <li>2. Intentional state entailment: [?]People do not want to know just the events that occur in the narrative, but also the motivations, thoughts and feelings behind them. Supporting narrative comprehension means communicating clearly not just what the agent does, but its reason for doing it.</li> <li>3. Diachronicity: [?]In a narrative, events do not happen randomly and independently; they are connected to and affect one another. The transitions previously mentioned work to knit behaviors into a coherent sequence.</li></ul></blockquote> So, just as you observed that "Bondage-chICK" was inappropriate for the perl programmer environment so too I must say would a number of other non-perl people. I guess any of us could be a bot in the wrong environment. Is there a place where bots are real then?! Sengers, P. (2002) '<a href="http://muse.uq.edu.au.mate.lib.unimelb.edu.au/journals/leonardo/v035/35.4sengers.pdf">Schizophrenia and Narrative in Artificial Agents</a>' in Leonardo, Vol. 35, 4, pp:427-431 [Online] Available at: http://muse.uq.edu.au.mate.lib.unimelb.edu.au/journals/leonardo/v035/35.4sengers.pdf [subscription only] Deprecated: preg_replace(): The /e modifier is deprecated, use preg_replace_callback instead in /home/writerresponse/writerresponsetheory.org/wordpress/wp-includes/functions-formatting.php on line 76

Interesting situation. Poor girl. Isn’t that the worst insult?: “Your thoughts are akin to that of a freely-downloadable simple-reflex program.” But really, how many people do react to everyday events with robot precision? Many. That is one of the appeals of bots for me: they perform the self-obsessed unchanging one-dimensional dependant person so well (among other characters). A character from the code out. Simple responses to life and random, unclear and disjointed thoughts are not the domain of bots alone. So, back to your pertinent questions:

How does one writes like a bot - how does one avoid it?

What does the potential for confusion do to us when we are writers in a social space such as a weblog or IM?

I don’t think this is a problem for IM since the ping factor ? users can tell if a bot is online because of the amount of ?pings? [there’s a paper on this but I can’t recall the title, author or find it right now?].

The question of interest to me as a bot master is that of ?how does one avoid writing like a bot??. By ?writing? I don’t mean the natural language in isolation but also the construction of the pattern-matching or whatever system I employ. A fascinating paper by Phoebe Sengers parallels current agent behaviour with that of schizophrenic patients. Agents, she argues, exhibit the ?fragmented, depersonalized behaviour? (427). The ?fundamental problem for both schizophrenic patients and agents is that observers have difficulty understanding them narratively? (ibid.). Sengers blames this agent state on the methodologies employed by designers:

Generally speaking, an agent’s behavior consists of short dalliances in individual behaviors with abrupt changes between them. It is this overall defective nature of agent behavior, caused by underintegration of behavioral units, that I term ’schizophrenia’ and address here.

In order to facilitate comprehension then Sengers proposes ?socially situated AI?: where the social and cultural environment of the agent are design factors. She outlines three principles that distinguish this approach from others:

  • 1. An agent can only be evaluated with respect to its environment, which includes not only the objects with which it interacts, but also the creators and observers of the agent.?
  • 2. An agent?s design should focus, not on the agent itself, but on the dynamics of that agent with respect to its physical and social environments.
  • 3. An agent is a representation. Artificial agents are a mirror of their creators? understanding of what it means to be at once mechanical and human, intelligent, alive?what cultural theorists call a subject?This means in a fundamental sense that, in our agents, we are not creating life but representing it, in ways that make sense to us, given our specific cultural backgrounds.

(430)

Sengers cartoon from her paper

Sengers has developed therefore a “narrative agent architecture” based on narrative psychology and AI theory, the Expressivator, to develop the architecture to actuate these principles. They are explained as:

  • 1. Context sensitivity and negotiability: [?]In order to design narratively expressive agents, designers must respect (rather than attempt to override) the context- and audience dependency of narrative comprehension.
  • 2. Intentional state entailment: [?]People do not want to know just the events that occur in the narrative, but also the motivations, thoughts and feelings behind them. Supporting narrative comprehension means communicating clearly not just what the agent does, but its reason for doing it.
  • 3. Diachronicity: [?]In a narrative, events do not happen randomly and independently; they are connected to and affect one another. The transitions previously mentioned work to knit behaviors into a coherent sequence.

So, just as you observed that “Bondage-chICK” was inappropriate for the perl programmer environment so too I must say would a number of other non-perl people. I guess any of us could be a bot in the wrong environment. Is there a place where bots are real then?!

Sengers, P. (2002) ‘Schizophrenia and Narrative in Artificial Agents‘ in Leonardo, Vol. 35, 4, pp:427-431 [Online] Available at: http://muse.uq.edu.au.mate.lib.unimelb.edu.au/journals/leonardo/v035/35.4sengers.pdf [subscription only]

]]>
Christy Dena Interesting situation. Poor girl. Isn't that the worst insult?: "Your thoughts are akin to that of a freely-downloadable simple-reflex program." ... Interesting situation. Poor girl. Isn't that the worst insult?: "Your thoughts are akin to that of a freely-downloadable simple-reflex program." ...

Deprecated: Function split() is deprecated in /home/writerresponse/writerresponsetheory.org/wordpress/wp-includes/cache.php on line 215