Comments on: Calling for Clever Critics http://writerresponsetheory.org/wordpress/2005/02/18/calling-for-clever-critics/ a blog and podcast dedicated to discussing text arts forms Sat, 22 Nov 2008 04:00:39 +0000 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.0.2 en Writer Response Theory 2004-2005 wrt@writerresponsetheory.org (Writer Response Theory) wrt@writerresponsetheory.org Talk Radio Comment-cast: Calling for Clever Critics Comment-cast: Calling for Clever Critics Writer Response Theory Writer Response Theory wrt@writerresponsetheory.org http://writerresponsetheory.org/wordpress/wp-content/uploads/iTWRT.JPG WRT: Writer Response Theory http://writerresponsetheory.org/wordpress 144 144 by: John P http://writerresponsetheory.org/wordpress/2005/02/18/calling-for-clever-critics/#comment-6 Tue, 30 Nov 1999 00:00:00 +0000 http://writerresponsetheory.org/wordpress/2005/02/18/calling-for-clever-critics/#comment-6 Anyone feel like reviewing my chatbot, A.I. Alex? It's at http://ai-alex.propercomfy.co.uk. The bot is available for download, or you can talk to it online. <br /> <br /> If anyone does do a review of it, can you drop me a line as well (replabjohn@hotmail.com). That way I can put a link on my site to the review - or just post the text there if you want.<br /> <br /> Oh, and Alex is entered in this year's ChatterBox Challange (http://web.infoave.net/~kbcowart/), so feel free to vote for it there ;)<br /> Anyone feel like reviewing my chatbot, A.I. Alex? It’s at http://ai-alex.propercomfy.co.uk. The bot is available for download, or you can talk to it online.

If anyone does do a review of it, can you drop me a line as well (replabjohn@hotmail.com). That way I can put a link on my site to the review - or just post the text there if you want.

Oh, and Alex is entered in this year’s ChatterBox Challange (http://web.infoave.net/~kbcowart/), so feel free to vote for it there ;)

]]> John P Anyone feel like reviewing my chatbot, A.I. Alex? It's at http://ai-alex.propercomfy.co.uk. The bot is available for download, or you can ... Anyone feel like reviewing my chatbot, A.I. Alex? It's at http://ai-alex.propercomfy.co.uk. The bot is available for download, or you can ... by: Christy Dena http://writerresponsetheory.org/wordpress/2005/02/18/calling-for-clever-critics/#comment-5 Tue, 30 Nov 1999 00:00:00 +0000 http://writerresponsetheory.org/wordpress/2005/02/18/calling-for-clever-critics/#comment-5 Hello Websafe,<br /> <br /> Yes, onward and upward indeed! I should make this clear now that you're all welcome to email Mark, Jeremy or myself with reviews of bots. We'll post them for you. Hello Websafe,

Yes, onward and upward indeed! I should make this clear now that you’re all welcome to email Mark, Jeremy or myself with reviews of bots. We’ll post them for you.

]]> Christy Dena Hello Websafe, Yes, onward and upward indeed! I should make this clear now that you're all welcome to email Mark, Jeremy ... Hello Websafe, Yes, onward and upward indeed! I should make this clear now that you're all welcome to email Mark, Jeremy ... by: Websafe http://writerresponsetheory.org/wordpress/2005/02/18/calling-for-clever-critics/#comment-4 Tue, 30 Nov 1999 00:00:00 +0000 http://writerresponsetheory.org/wordpress/2005/02/18/calling-for-clever-critics/#comment-4 Well-written reviews of any media are sometimes more interesting than the piece itself! A case in point: Anthony Lane's film reviews in "The New Yorker."<br /> <br /> Lewis laCook's review of ada1852 was good. I had my first successful chat with her just now. There were always some unexplained technical problems before. Because of this, I have never yet been able to view the art in the database. Rhizome's arrangement of making Friday a free day and asking for a modest membership fee to cover other days sounds eminently fair.<br /> <br /> Jill Walker's review of Online Caroline was excellent. She brought out the queasy, uneasy elements of interactive theater in general. A lot of people I know don't want to chat with bots, but can't articulate why; they might just say it's "creepy." Walker's review helps to examine this.<br /> <br /> I like seeing bots/interactive theater taken seriously as art forms. Onward and upward! Well-written reviews of any media are sometimes more interesting than the piece itself! A case in point: Anthony Lane’s film reviews in “The New Yorker.”

Lewis laCook’s review of ada1852 was good. I had my first successful chat with her just now. There were always some unexplained technical problems before. Because of this, I have never yet been able to view the art in the database. Rhizome’s arrangement of making Friday a free day and asking for a modest membership fee to cover other days sounds eminently fair.

Jill Walker’s review of Online Caroline was excellent. She brought out the queasy, uneasy elements of interactive theater in general. A lot of people I know don’t want to chat with bots, but can’t articulate why; they might just say it’s “creepy.” Walker’s review helps to examine this.

I like seeing bots/interactive theater taken seriously as art forms. Onward and upward!

]]> Websafe Well-written reviews of any media are sometimes more interesting than the piece itself! A case in point: Anthony Lane's film ... Well-written reviews of any media are sometimes more interesting than the piece itself! A case in point: Anthony Lane's film ...