<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.0.2" -->
<rss version="2.0" 
    xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd" 
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Critical Code Studies 2</title>
	<link>http://writerresponsetheory.org/wordpress/2005/04/04/critical-code-studies-2/</link>
	<description>a blog and podcast dedicated to discussing text arts forms</description>
	<pubDate>Mon, 06 Oct 2008 18:10:45 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.0.2</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	
	 <copyright>Writer Response Theory 2004-2005</copyright>
    <managingEditor>wrt@writerresponsetheory.org (Writer Response Theory)</managingEditor>
    <webMaster>wrt@writerresponsetheory.org</webMaster>

    <category>Talk Radio</category>
   <itunes:category text="Arts &amp; Entertainment" ><itunes:category text="Entertainment" />
</itunes:category>
<itunes:category text="Education" ><itunes:category text="Higher Education" />
</itunes:category>
<itunes:category text="Technology" ><itunes:category text="Developers" />
</itunes:category>
	
    <itunes:subtitle>Comment-cast: Critical Code Studies 2</itunes:subtitle>
    <itunes:summary>Comment-cast: Critical Code Studies 2</itunes:summary>
    
    <itunes:author>Writer Response Theory</itunes:author>    
    <itunes:owner>
        <itunes:name>Writer Response Theory</itunes:name>
        <itunes:email>wrt@writerresponsetheory.org</itunes:email>
    </itunes:owner>
    
    <itunes:image href="http://writerresponsetheory.org/wordpress/wp-content/uploads/iTWRTl.JPG" />
    

	<item>
		<title>by: Critical Code Studies, the blog at WRT: Writer Response Theory</title>
		<link>http://writerresponsetheory.org/wordpress/2005/04/04/critical-code-studies-2/#comment-152767</link>
		<pubDate>Mon, 12 Nov 2007 05:39:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://writerresponsetheory.org/wordpress/2005/04/04/critical-code-studies-2/#comment-152767</guid>
					<description>[...] In previous posts on this site (1, 2) , I have outlined some of the basic proposal for Critical Code Studies (CCS), and the fullest articulation appears in the electronic book review, here. Last year at MLA and more recently at SLSA, I offered more of the fundamentals and met many who expressed interest in or affinities for the project. Here, I am announcing a new blog that will be a hub of CCS work, known as CriticalCodeStudies.com. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] In previous posts on this site (1, 2) , I have outlined some of the basic proposal for Critical Code Studies (CCS), and the fullest articulation appears in the electronic book review, here. Last year at MLA and more recently at SLSA, I offered more of the fundamentals and met many who expressed interest in or affinities for the project. Here, I am announcing a new blog that will be a hub of CCS work, known as CriticalCodeStudies.com. [&#8230;]
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			                <itunes:author>Critical Code Studies, the blog at WRT: Writer Response Theory</itunes:author>
        <itunes:subtitle>[...] In previous posts on this site (1, 2) , I have outlined some of the basic proposal for Critical ...</itunes:subtitle>
        <itunes:summary>[...] In previous posts on this site (1, 2) , I have outlined some of the basic proposal for Critical ...</itunes:summary>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Critical Code Studies in ebr at WRT: Writer Response Theory</title>
		<link>http://writerresponsetheory.org/wordpress/2005/04/04/critical-code-studies-2/#comment-20824</link>
		<pubDate>Mon, 18 Dec 2006 12:41:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://writerresponsetheory.org/wordpress/2005/04/04/critical-code-studies-2/#comment-20824</guid>
					<description>[...] [This post follows up on two previous posts on WRT.  Here are the original posts ( 1, 2 )and a follow-up post by Jeremy.] Critical Code Studies first began as an inspiration here on WRT. This December marks the formal launch with the publication of &amp;#8220;Critical Code Studies&amp;#8221; in the electronic book review and with Rita Raley&amp;#8217;s &amp;#8220;Reading Code&amp;#8221; panel at MLA 2006 in Philadelphia. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] [This post follows up on two previous posts on WRT.  Here are the original posts ( 1, 2 )and a follow-up post by Jeremy.] Critical Code Studies first began as an inspiration here on WRT. This December marks the formal launch with the publication of &#8220;Critical Code Studies&#8221; in the electronic book review and with Rita Raley&#8217;s &#8220;Reading Code&#8221; panel at MLA 2006 in Philadelphia. [&#8230;]
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			                <itunes:author>Critical Code Studies in ebr at WRT: Writer Response Theory</itunes:author>
        <itunes:subtitle>[...] [This post follows up on two previous posts on WRT.  Here are the original posts ( 1, 2 )and ...</itunes:subtitle>
        <itunes:summary>[...] [This post follows up on two previous posts on WRT.  Here are the original posts ( 1, 2 )and ...</itunes:summary>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Mark Marino</title>
		<link>http://writerresponsetheory.org/wordpress/2005/04/04/critical-code-studies-2/#comment-243</link>
		<pubDate>Thu, 23 Jun 2005 19:12:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://writerresponsetheory.org/wordpress/2005/04/04/critical-code-studies-2/#comment-243</guid>
					<description>Soren, 
Thanks for this link.  A lot of my early work has been to distance myself from code-made-into-art in order to emphasize the code-as-art side of Critical Code Studies.  I certainly agree with the manifesto, and might go further to add that &quot;Code is a Rhetoric&quot; as Linda Williams put it to me.

</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Soren,<br />
Thanks for this link.  A lot of my early work has been to distance myself from code-made-into-art in order to emphasize the code-as-art side of Critical Code Studies.  I certainly agree with the manifesto, and might go further to add that &#8220;Code is a Rhetoric&#8221; as Linda Williams put it to me.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			                <itunes:author>Mark Marino</itunes:author>
        <itunes:subtitle>Soren, 
Thanks for this link.  A lot of my early work has been to distance myself from code-made-into-art in ...</itunes:subtitle>
        <itunes:summary>Soren, 
Thanks for this link.  A lot of my early work has been to distance myself from code-made-into-art in ...</itunes:summary>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Soeren Pold</title>
		<link>http://writerresponsetheory.org/wordpress/2005/04/04/critical-code-studies-2/#comment-193</link>
		<pubDate>Tue, 14 Jun 2005 07:26:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://writerresponsetheory.org/wordpress/2005/04/04/critical-code-studies-2/#comment-193</guid>
					<description>Hi,

Do you know of TOPLAP http://toplap.org/, which is an acronym for (Temporary&amp;#124;Transnational&amp;#124;Terrestrial&amp;#124;Transdimensional) Organisation for the (Promotion&amp;#124;Proliferation&amp;#124;Permanence&amp;#124;Purity) of Live (Algorithm&amp;#124;Audio&amp;#124;Art&amp;#124;Artistic) Programming? 
They performed at the Read_me Software Art Festival in Aarhus, Denmark in August 2004 - and they do live coding, that is coding concerts that is performed live, projected on screens so the coding is part of the performance, not 'behind'. I quote from their manifesto:
&quot;Live coding is not about tools. Algorithms are thoughts. Chainsaws are tools. That's why algorithms are sometimes harder to notice than chainsaws.&quot; http://toplap.org/?node=ManifestoDraft

For more see their website and other examples of code-related software art at www.runme.org.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi,</p>
<p>Do you know of TOPLAP <a href='http://toplap.org/' rel='nofollow'>http://toplap.org/</a>, which is an acronym for (Temporary|Transnational|Terrestrial|Transdimensional) Organisation for the (Promotion|Proliferation|Permanence|Purity) of Live (Algorithm|Audio|Art|Artistic) Programming?<br />
They performed at the Read_me Software Art Festival in Aarhus, Denmark in August 2004 - and they do live coding, that is coding concerts that is performed live, projected on screens so the coding is part of the performance, not &#8216;behind&#8217;. I quote from their manifesto:<br />
&#8220;Live coding is not about tools. Algorithms are thoughts. Chainsaws are tools. That&#8217;s why algorithms are sometimes harder to notice than chainsaws.&#8221; <a href='http://toplap.org/?node=ManifestoDraft' rel='nofollow'>http://toplap.org/?node=ManifestoDraft</a></p>
<p>For more see their website and other examples of code-related software art at <a href='http://www.runme.org.' rel='nofollow'>www.runme.org.</a>
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			                <itunes:author>Soeren Pold</itunes:author>
        <itunes:subtitle>Hi,

Do you know of TOPLAP http://toplap.org/, which is an acronym for (Temporary|Transnational|Terrestrial|Transdimensional) Organisation for the (Promotion|Proliferation|Permanence|Purity) of Live (Algorithm|Audio|Art|Artistic) Programming? ...</itunes:subtitle>
        <itunes:summary>Hi,

Do you know of TOPLAP http://toplap.org/, which is an acronym for (Temporary|Transnational|Terrestrial|Transdimensional) Organisation for the (Promotion|Proliferation|Permanence|Purity) of Live (Algorithm|Audio|Art|Artistic) Programming? ...</itunes:summary>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Mark Marino</title>
		<link>http://writerresponsetheory.org/wordpress/2005/04/04/critical-code-studies-2/#comment-86</link>
		<pubDate>Tue, 30 Nov 1999 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://writerresponsetheory.org/wordpress/2005/04/04/critical-code-studies-2/#comment-86</guid>
					<description>Jeremy just mentioned to me (and correct any of this as you wish Jeremy) that CCS may need to address the issue of the metaphor of the computer language.  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In spoken languages, living oral languages, the division between linguistics (operationality) and literature is clear.  In the case of code and programmers the relationship is different and less clear.  This is the next place to address our attention. </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Jeremy just mentioned to me (and correct any of this as you wish Jeremy) that CCS may need to address the issue of the metaphor of the computer language.  </p>
<p>In spoken languages, living oral languages, the division between linguistics (operationality) and literature is clear.  In the case of code and programmers the relationship is different and less clear.  This is the next place to address our attention.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			                <itunes:author>Mark Marino</itunes:author>
        <itunes:subtitle>Jeremy just mentioned to me (and correct any of this as you wish Jeremy) that CCS may need to address ...</itunes:subtitle>
        <itunes:summary>Jeremy just mentioned to me (and correct any of this as you wish Jeremy) that CCS may need to address ...</itunes:summary>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
