<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.0.2" -->
<rss version="2.0" 
    xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd" 
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Blog User Stats</title>
	<link>http://writerresponsetheory.org/wordpress/2005/08/28/blog-user-stats/</link>
	<description>a blog and podcast dedicated to discussing text arts forms</description>
	<pubDate>Sat, 22 Nov 2008 06:31:44 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.0.2</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	
	 <copyright>Writer Response Theory 2004-2005</copyright>
    <managingEditor>wrt@writerresponsetheory.org (Writer Response Theory)</managingEditor>
    <webMaster>wrt@writerresponsetheory.org</webMaster>

    <category>Talk Radio</category>
   <itunes:category text="Arts &amp; Entertainment" ><itunes:category text="Entertainment" />
</itunes:category>
<itunes:category text="Education" ><itunes:category text="Higher Education" />
</itunes:category>
<itunes:category text="Technology" ><itunes:category text="Developers" />
</itunes:category>
	
    <itunes:subtitle>Comment-cast: Blog User Stats</itunes:subtitle>
    <itunes:summary>Comment-cast: Blog User Stats</itunes:summary>
    
    <itunes:author>Writer Response Theory</itunes:author>    
    <itunes:owner>
        <itunes:name>Writer Response Theory</itunes:name>
        <itunes:email>wrt@writerresponsetheory.org</itunes:email>
    </itunes:owner>
    
    <itunes:image href="http://writerresponsetheory.org/wordpress/wp-content/uploads/iTWRTl.JPG" />
    

	<item>
		<title>by: Christy Dena</title>
		<link>http://writerresponsetheory.org/wordpress/2005/08/28/blog-user-stats/#comment-411</link>
		<pubDate>Sat, 03 Sep 2005 12:55:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://writerresponsetheory.org/wordpress/2005/08/28/blog-user-stats/#comment-411</guid>
					<description>I spoke too soon. Of course this 'cash-for-comment' or goodies-for-content is already happening. Prof. Chris Dellarocas has a working paper on such manipulations:

Dellarocas, C. (2004) '&lt;a href=&quot;http://ccs.mit.edu/dell/opinionforums.html&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Strategic Manipulation of Internet Opinion Forums: Implications for Consumers and Firms&lt;/a&gt;' University of Maryland, Maryland, Working Paper.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I spoke too soon. Of course this &#8216;cash-for-comment&#8217; or goodies-for-content is already happening. Prof. Chris Dellarocas has a working paper on such manipulations:</p>
<p>Dellarocas, C. (2004) &#8216;<a href="http://ccs.mit.edu/dell/opinionforums.html" rel="nofollow">Strategic Manipulation of Internet Opinion Forums: Implications for Consumers and Firms</a>&#8216; University of Maryland, Maryland, Working Paper.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			                <itunes:author>Christy Dena</itunes:author>
        <itunes:subtitle>I spoke too soon. Of course this 'cash-for-comment' or goodies-for-content is already happening. Prof. Chris Dellarocas has a working paper ...</itunes:subtitle>
        <itunes:summary>I spoke too soon. Of course this 'cash-for-comment' or goodies-for-content is already happening. Prof. Chris Dellarocas has a working paper ...</itunes:summary>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Christy Dena</title>
		<link>http://writerresponsetheory.org/wordpress/2005/08/28/blog-user-stats/#comment-401</link>
		<pubDate>Mon, 29 Aug 2005 09:35:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://writerresponsetheory.org/wordpress/2005/08/28/blog-user-stats/#comment-401</guid>
					<description>I just thought too, I wonder when we'll see (unless it is already happening) 'cash-for-comment' on blogs? Rather than people being paid to put in comments that link to a site to increase search status, the comments are engineered to make who the content is about look good.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I just thought too, I wonder when we&#8217;ll see (unless it is already happening) &#8216;cash-for-comment&#8217; on blogs? Rather than people being paid to put in comments that link to a site to increase search status, the comments are engineered to make who the content is about look good.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			                <itunes:author>Christy Dena</itunes:author>
        <itunes:subtitle>I just thought too, I wonder when we'll see (unless it is already happening) 'cash-for-comment' on blogs? Rather than people ...</itunes:subtitle>
        <itunes:summary>I just thought too, I wonder when we'll see (unless it is already happening) 'cash-for-comment' on blogs? Rather than people ...</itunes:summary>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Christy Dena</title>
		<link>http://writerresponsetheory.org/wordpress/2005/08/28/blog-user-stats/#comment-399</link>
		<pubDate>Sun, 28 Aug 2005 23:45:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://writerresponsetheory.org/wordpress/2005/08/28/blog-user-stats/#comment-399</guid>
					<description>The other term I've heard is 'splog'.

I do have another post about blog spam that I had set for another time, but I've moved it forward, in light of your post.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The other term I&#8217;ve heard is &#8217;splog&#8217;.</p>
<p>I do have another post about blog spam that I had set for another time, but I&#8217;ve moved it forward, in light of your post.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			                <itunes:author>Christy Dena</itunes:author>
        <itunes:subtitle>The other term I've heard is 'splog'.

I do have another post about blog spam that I had set for another ...</itunes:subtitle>
        <itunes:summary>The other term I've heard is 'splog'.

I do have another post about blog spam that I had set for another ...</itunes:summary>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Jeremy Douglass</title>
		<link>http://writerresponsetheory.org/wordpress/2005/08/28/blog-user-stats/#comment-398</link>
		<pubDate>Sun, 28 Aug 2005 23:30:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://writerresponsetheory.org/wordpress/2005/08/28/blog-user-stats/#comment-398</guid>
					<description>Interesting angle - that companies are curious about how to leverage blogs/podcasting/rss, and are worried about controlling the speech of blogging employees in their off hours... I'd add to those issues another concern: blog spam (a.k.a blam) / spam blogs (a.k.a. smogs).  While blog spam (of the trackback / pingback variety) is growing, forcing higher profile sites to lock down their systems, the real concern I have is from algorithmically generated spam blogs (complete blogs which are themselves spam) designed to flood search engines and indexes with skewed information.

Of course, this directs us back to art.  One person's blam and smog is another person's algorithmically generated digital fiction....</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Interesting angle - that companies are curious about how to leverage blogs/podcasting/rss, and are worried about controlling the speech of blogging employees in their off hours&#8230; I&#8217;d add to those issues another concern: blog spam (a.k.a blam) / spam blogs (a.k.a. smogs).  While blog spam (of the trackback / pingback variety) is growing, forcing higher profile sites to lock down their systems, the real concern I have is from algorithmically generated spam blogs (complete blogs which are themselves spam) designed to flood search engines and indexes with skewed information.</p>
<p>Of course, this directs us back to art.  One person&#8217;s blam and smog is another person&#8217;s algorithmically generated digital fiction&#8230;.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			                <itunes:author>Jeremy Douglass</itunes:author>
        <itunes:subtitle>Interesting angle - that companies are curious about how to leverage blogs/podcasting/rss, and are worried about controlling the speech of ...</itunes:subtitle>
        <itunes:summary>Interesting angle - that companies are curious about how to leverage blogs/podcasting/rss, and are worried about controlling the speech of ...</itunes:summary>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
