<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.0.2" -->
<rss version="2.0" 
    xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd" 
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Blam Art?</title>
	<link>http://writerresponsetheory.org/wordpress/2005/08/28/spam-art/</link>
	<description>a blog and podcast dedicated to discussing text arts forms</description>
	<pubDate>Wed, 16 May 2012 23:38:10 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.0.2</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	
	 <copyright>Writer Response Theory 2004-2005</copyright>
    <managingEditor>wrt@writerresponsetheory.org (Writer Response Theory)</managingEditor>
    <webMaster>wrt@writerresponsetheory.org</webMaster>

    <category>Talk Radio</category>
   <itunes:category text="Arts &amp; Entertainment" ><itunes:category text="Entertainment" />
</itunes:category>
<itunes:category text="Education" ><itunes:category text="Higher Education" />
</itunes:category>
<itunes:category text="Technology" ><itunes:category text="Developers" />
</itunes:category>
	
    <itunes:subtitle>Comment-cast: Blam Art?</itunes:subtitle>
    <itunes:summary>Comment-cast: Blam Art?</itunes:summary>
    
    <itunes:author>Writer Response Theory</itunes:author>    
    <itunes:owner>
        <itunes:name>Writer Response Theory</itunes:name>
        <itunes:email>wrt@writerresponsetheory.org</itunes:email>
    </itunes:owner>
    
    <itunes:image href="http://writerresponsetheory.org/wordpress/wp-content/uploads/iTWRTl.JPG" />
    

	<item>
		<title>by: Christy Dena</title>
		<link>http://writerresponsetheory.org/wordpress/2005/08/28/spam-art/#comment-11715</link>
		<pubDate>Wed, 12 Jul 2006 11:43:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://writerresponsetheory.org/wordpress/2005/08/28/spam-art/#comment-11715</guid>
					<description>So true! I don't think there are any organised spam/blam/smog art events that use any of those terms just yet. Hmm...have to wait for the virus to spread!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>So true! I don&#8217;t think there are any organised spam/blam/smog art events that use any of those terms just yet. Hmm&#8230;have to wait for the virus to spread!
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			                <itunes:author>Christy Dena</itunes:author>
        <itunes:subtitle>So true! I don't think there are any organised spam/blam/smog art events that use any of those terms just yet. ...</itunes:subtitle>
        <itunes:summary>So true! I don't think there are any organised spam/blam/smog art events that use any of those terms just yet. ...</itunes:summary>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Jeremy Douglass</title>
		<link>http://writerresponsetheory.org/wordpress/2005/08/28/spam-art/#comment-11713</link>
		<pubDate>Wed, 12 Jul 2006 09:34:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://writerresponsetheory.org/wordpress/2005/08/28/spam-art/#comment-11713</guid>
					<description>Well, &quot;blam&quot; is also an onomatopoeia, so likewise ambiguous. And the ambiguity is part of the appeal - after all, &quot;spam&quot; refers to a brand of tinned meat....</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well, &#8220;blam&#8221; is also an onomatopoeia, so likewise ambiguous. And the ambiguity is part of the appeal - after all, &#8220;spam&#8221; refers to a brand of tinned meat&#8230;.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			                <itunes:author>Jeremy Douglass</itunes:author>
        <itunes:subtitle>Well, "blam" is also an onomatopoeia, so likewise ambiguous. And the ambiguity is part of the appeal - after all, ...</itunes:subtitle>
        <itunes:summary>Well, "blam" is also an onomatopoeia, so likewise ambiguous. And the ambiguity is part of the appeal - after all, ...</itunes:summary>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Christy Dena</title>
		<link>http://writerresponsetheory.org/wordpress/2005/08/28/spam-art/#comment-11502</link>
		<pubDate>Sat, 08 Jul 2006 09:19:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://writerresponsetheory.org/wordpress/2005/08/28/spam-art/#comment-11502</guid>
					<description>I do like 'smog' when I know it is a portmandeu, but it also could be read as 'smog' as in weather. So I think the ambiguity cancels it out as a viable descriptor...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I do like &#8217;smog&#8217; when I know it is a portmandeu, but it also could be read as &#8217;smog&#8217; as in weather. So I think the ambiguity cancels it out as a viable descriptor&#8230;
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			                <itunes:author>Christy Dena</itunes:author>
        <itunes:subtitle>I do like 'smog' when I know it is a portmandeu, but it also could be read as 'smog' as ...</itunes:subtitle>
        <itunes:summary>I do like 'smog' when I know it is a portmandeu, but it also could be read as 'smog' as ...</itunes:summary>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Jeremy Douglass</title>
		<link>http://writerresponsetheory.org/wordpress/2005/08/28/spam-art/#comment-694</link>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 Nov 2005 22:11:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://writerresponsetheory.org/wordpress/2005/08/28/spam-art/#comment-694</guid>
					<description>Regarding the various blog / spam terms, it occurred to me the other day that we now have two major variations:

&quot;blam&quot; or blog-spam, a.k.a. comment spam - individual spams attached to blog entries

&quot;splogs&quot; or spam-blogs - entire blogs created for the purpose of generating search result and trackback spam

I was really fond of the term &quot;smog&quot; but it doesn't appear to be taking off. Perhaps as a description of spam-blog search results?

...of course, that leaves out blogs-discussing-spam, like Email Days... also blog-art-imitating-spam, etc....

smog</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Regarding the various blog / spam terms, it occurred to me the other day that we now have two major variations:</p>
<p>&#8220;blam&#8221; or blog-spam, a.k.a. comment spam - individual spams attached to blog entries</p>
<p>&#8220;splogs&#8221; or spam-blogs - entire blogs created for the purpose of generating search result and trackback spam</p>
<p>I was really fond of the term &#8220;smog&#8221; but it doesn&#8217;t appear to be taking off. Perhaps as a description of spam-blog search results?</p>
<p>&#8230;of course, that leaves out blogs-discussing-spam, like Email Days&#8230; also blog-art-imitating-spam, etc&#8230;.</p>
<p>smog
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			                <itunes:author>Jeremy Douglass</itunes:author>
        <itunes:subtitle>Regarding the various blog / spam terms, it occurred to me the other day that we now have two major ...</itunes:subtitle>
        <itunes:summary>Regarding the various blog / spam terms, it occurred to me the other day that we now have two major ...</itunes:summary>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

