<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.0.2" -->
<rss version="2.0" 
    xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd" 
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: SMS bandwidth and digital text art</title>
	<link>http://writerresponsetheory.org/wordpress/2005/11/01/sms-bandwidth-and-digital-text-art/</link>
	<description>a blog and podcast dedicated to discussing text arts forms</description>
	<pubDate>Tue, 06 Jan 2009 15:44:28 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.0.2</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	
	 <copyright>Writer Response Theory 2004-2005</copyright>
    <managingEditor>wrt@writerresponsetheory.org (Writer Response Theory)</managingEditor>
    <webMaster>wrt@writerresponsetheory.org</webMaster>

    <category>Talk Radio</category>
   <itunes:category text="Arts &amp; Entertainment" ><itunes:category text="Entertainment" />
</itunes:category>
<itunes:category text="Education" ><itunes:category text="Higher Education" />
</itunes:category>
<itunes:category text="Technology" ><itunes:category text="Developers" />
</itunes:category>
	
    <itunes:subtitle>Comment-cast: SMS bandwidth and digital text art</itunes:subtitle>
    <itunes:summary>Comment-cast: SMS bandwidth and digital text art</itunes:summary>
    
    <itunes:author>Writer Response Theory</itunes:author>    
    <itunes:owner>
        <itunes:name>Writer Response Theory</itunes:name>
        <itunes:email>wrt@writerresponsetheory.org</itunes:email>
    </itunes:owner>
    
    <itunes:image href="http://writerresponsetheory.org/wordpress/wp-content/uploads/iTWRTl.JPG" />
    

	<item>
		<title>by: sms advertising</title>
		<link>http://writerresponsetheory.org/wordpress/2005/11/01/sms-bandwidth-and-digital-text-art/#comment-215686</link>
		<pubDate>Sun, 01 Jun 2008 05:44:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://writerresponsetheory.org/wordpress/2005/11/01/sms-bandwidth-and-digital-text-art/#comment-215686</guid>
					<description>I know this is an old post, but I get all kinds of stuff forwarded to me from friends, mostly x rated, if I got charged, ohh I'd be pissed</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I know this is an old post, but I get all kinds of stuff forwarded to me from friends, mostly x rated, if I got charged, ohh I&#8217;d be pissed
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			                <itunes:author>sms advertising</itunes:author>
        <itunes:subtitle>I know this is an old post, but I get all kinds of stuff forwarded to me from friends, mostly ...</itunes:subtitle>
        <itunes:summary>I know this is an old post, but I get all kinds of stuff forwarded to me from friends, mostly ...</itunes:summary>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Jeremy Douglass</title>
		<link>http://writerresponsetheory.org/wordpress/2005/11/01/sms-bandwidth-and-digital-text-art/#comment-616</link>
		<pubDate>Fri, 04 Nov 2005 02:45:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://writerresponsetheory.org/wordpress/2005/11/01/sms-bandwidth-and-digital-text-art/#comment-616</guid>
					<description>Looking over this post, I see some real problems with my thinking - the first of which is that I'm no economist, and that at any rate I need to dig up my old notes on the history of telegraph use before I start arguing parallels. 

Still, considering at email quizzes and office forwards and other memes in particular, I'm leaning towards it being a question of developing a personal style more than general experience. it doesn't seem like these are behaviors that really die out - I know people who've been sending corny forwards for 13+ years.  Of course, email is free to send....</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Looking over this post, I see some real problems with my thinking - the first of which is that I&#8217;m no economist, and that at any rate I need to dig up my old notes on the history of telegraph use before I start arguing parallels. </p>
<p>Still, considering at email quizzes and office forwards and other memes in particular, I&#8217;m leaning towards it being a question of developing a personal style more than general experience. it doesn&#8217;t seem like these are behaviors that really die out - I know people who&#8217;ve been sending corny forwards for 13+ years.  Of course, email is free to send&#8230;.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			                <itunes:author>Jeremy Douglass</itunes:author>
        <itunes:subtitle>Looking over this post, I see some real problems with my thinking - the first of which is that I'm ...</itunes:subtitle>
        <itunes:summary>Looking over this post, I see some real problems with my thinking - the first of which is that I'm ...</itunes:summary>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Christy Dena</title>
		<link>http://writerresponsetheory.org/wordpress/2005/11/01/sms-bandwidth-and-digital-text-art/#comment-606</link>
		<pubDate>Wed, 02 Nov 2005 08:29:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://writerresponsetheory.org/wordpress/2005/11/01/sms-bandwidth-and-digital-text-art/#comment-606</guid>
					<description>Interesting point about the double logic of SMS greetings: txt efficiency and superfluous communication. 

I must admit, I don't think about SMS costs, I think about phone costs though. And I think sending on an SMS poem is just the same as passing on an email quiz. Everyone who is new to it does it, but learns pretty quickly (some don't however) that these not very welcome. The reason? I guess we can tell products made for consumption/manipulation as opposed to those with other ideals. Some succeed at doing both, which is great.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Interesting point about the double logic of SMS greetings: txt efficiency and superfluous communication. </p>
<p>I must admit, I don&#8217;t think about SMS costs, I think about phone costs though. And I think sending on an SMS poem is just the same as passing on an email quiz. Everyone who is new to it does it, but learns pretty quickly (some don&#8217;t however) that these not very welcome. The reason? I guess we can tell products made for consumption/manipulation as opposed to those with other ideals. Some succeed at doing both, which is great.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			                <itunes:author>Christy Dena</itunes:author>
        <itunes:subtitle>Interesting point about the double logic of SMS greetings: txt efficiency and superfluous communication. 

I must admit, I don't think ...</itunes:subtitle>
        <itunes:summary>Interesting point about the double logic of SMS greetings: txt efficiency and superfluous communication. 

I must admit, I don't think ...</itunes:summary>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
