Strict Standards: Non-static method installk2::installer() should not be called statically in /home/writerresponse/writerresponsetheory.org/wordpress/wp-content/themes/3k2w-b2r344/functions.php on line 23

Warning: Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /home/writerresponse/writerresponsetheory.org/wordpress/wp-content/themes/3k2w-b2r344/functions.php:23) in /home/writerresponse/writerresponsetheory.org/wordpress/wp-commentsrss2.php on line 15
Comments on: Digital typography vs photography (via Flickr) http://writerresponsetheory.org/wordpress/2006/01/27/digital-typography-vs-photography-via-flickr/ a blog and podcast dedicated to discussing text arts forms Wed, 22 Nov 2017 14:56:31 +0000 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.0.2 en Writer Response Theory 2004-2005 wrt@writerresponsetheory.org (Writer Response Theory) wrt@writerresponsetheory.org Talk Radio Comment-cast: Digital typography vs photography (via Flickr) Comment-cast: Digital typography vs photography (via Flickr) Writer Response Theory Writer Response Theory wrt@writerresponsetheory.org http://writerresponsetheory.org/wordpress/wp-content/uploads/iTWRT.JPG WRT: Writer Response Theory http://writerresponsetheory.org/wordpress 144 144 by: Geoff Bridge Wedding Photography http://writerresponsetheory.org/wordpress/2006/01/27/digital-typography-vs-photography-via-flickr/#comment-266376 Fri, 19 Jun 2009 09:18:04 +0000 http://writerresponsetheory.org/wordpress/2006/01/27/digital-typography-vs-photography-via-flickr/#comment-266376 I feel that photography is art in itself, a captured expression or moment in time can be precious and in the same light altering or manipulating an image can produce beautiful pieces of art!! Interesting post, will bookmark this and stay in touch thank you Geoff Deprecated: preg_replace(): The /e modifier is deprecated, use preg_replace_callback instead in /home/writerresponse/writerresponsetheory.org/wordpress/wp-includes/functions-formatting.php on line 76

I feel that photography is art in itself, a captured expression or moment in time can be precious and in the same light altering or manipulating an image can produce beautiful pieces of art!!

Interesting post, will bookmark this and stay in touch thank you

Geoff

]]>
Geoff Bridge Wedding Photography I feel that photography is art in itself, a captured expression or moment in time can be precious and in ... I feel that photography is art in itself, a captured expression or moment in time can be precious and in ...
by: albertjames http://writerresponsetheory.org/wordpress/2006/01/27/digital-typography-vs-photography-via-flickr/#comment-240399 Sat, 04 Oct 2008 19:01:06 +0000 http://writerresponsetheory.org/wordpress/2006/01/27/digital-typography-vs-photography-via-flickr/#comment-240399 Barthes claimed in Camera Lucida that photography has a certain hold on us based on an ontological claim - that a photograph represents a real interaction with real light at some real point in the past. Whatever happens in the subsequent madness of development, editing, digitizing, morphing, or what-have-you, a photograph (in as much as it is one) bears this relationship to past light. ---------------- albertjames <a href="http://www.drivenwide.com" rel="nofollow">Social Media Marketing</a> Deprecated: preg_replace(): The /e modifier is deprecated, use preg_replace_callback instead in /home/writerresponse/writerresponsetheory.org/wordpress/wp-includes/functions-formatting.php on line 76

Barthes claimed in Camera Lucida that photography has a certain hold on us based on an ontological claim - that a photograph represents a real interaction with real light at some real point in the past. Whatever happens in the subsequent madness of development, editing, digitizing, morphing, or what-have-you, a photograph (in as much as it is one) bears this relationship to past light.
—————-
albertjames
Social Media Marketing

]]>
albertjames Barthes claimed in Camera Lucida that photography has a certain hold on us based on an ontological claim - that ... Barthes claimed in Camera Lucida that photography has a certain hold on us based on an ontological claim - that ...
by: Kristi http://writerresponsetheory.org/wordpress/2006/01/27/digital-typography-vs-photography-via-flickr/#comment-232699 Sun, 20 Jul 2008 05:51:47 +0000 http://writerresponsetheory.org/wordpress/2006/01/27/digital-typography-vs-photography-via-flickr/#comment-232699 This is to comment Longview: Yes most professional photographers will tell you that editing an image in any other way besides cropping the photograph, is "ruining" it. To them, its no longer a true photo. Its now a piece of art. I dont agree. And I will outwardly admit that I have on more than one ocassion edited a photos colors, brightness, etc. And to me its still the same photo it was before, now its just better. Deprecated: preg_replace(): The /e modifier is deprecated, use preg_replace_callback instead in /home/writerresponse/writerresponsetheory.org/wordpress/wp-includes/functions-formatting.php on line 76

This is to comment Longview:

Yes most professional photographers will tell you that editing an image in any other way besides cropping the photograph, is “ruining” it. To them, its no longer a true photo. Its now a piece of art.

I dont agree. And I will outwardly admit that I have on more than one ocassion edited a photos colors, brightness, etc. And to me its still the same photo it was before, now its just better.

]]>
Kristi This is to comment Longview: Yes most professional photographers will tell you that editing an image in any other way besides ... This is to comment Longview: Yes most professional photographers will tell you that editing an image in any other way besides ...
by: Longview Photography http://writerresponsetheory.org/wordpress/2006/01/27/digital-typography-vs-photography-via-flickr/#comment-231914 Fri, 18 Jul 2008 23:18:30 +0000 http://writerresponsetheory.org/wordpress/2006/01/27/digital-typography-vs-photography-via-flickr/#comment-231914 Interesting thought on this.... So do some people feel as though digitally manipulating photos is ruining the art? I often wonder... though working in certain formats creates art in itself... Thanks Deprecated: preg_replace(): The /e modifier is deprecated, use preg_replace_callback instead in /home/writerresponse/writerresponsetheory.org/wordpress/wp-includes/functions-formatting.php on line 76

Interesting thought on this….

So do some people feel as though digitally manipulating photos is ruining the art? I often wonder… though working in certain formats creates art in itself…

Thanks

]]>
Longview Photography Interesting thought on this.... So do some people feel as though digitally manipulating photos is ruining the art? I often wonder... ... Interesting thought on this.... So do some people feel as though digitally manipulating photos is ruining the art? I often wonder... ...
by: Thomas May Photography http://writerresponsetheory.org/wordpress/2006/01/27/digital-typography-vs-photography-via-flickr/#comment-208586 Wed, 23 Apr 2008 12:01:50 +0000 http://writerresponsetheory.org/wordpress/2006/01/27/digital-typography-vs-photography-via-flickr/#comment-208586 It's an interesting point. That a photograph has to represent a "real" interaction with real light at some real point. However, I feel the point is largely moot. In all photography, even analogue, the picture subject must go through some type of medium before reaching us. In this way, even if the source was real, the photo result is already different. Editing or producing photographs digitally is no different that using shooting analogue photos different settings to capture a certain mood. Still a good article though, thanks. Deprecated: preg_replace(): The /e modifier is deprecated, use preg_replace_callback instead in /home/writerresponse/writerresponsetheory.org/wordpress/wp-includes/functions-formatting.php on line 76

It’s an interesting point. That a photograph has to represent a “real” interaction with real light at some real point. However, I feel the point is largely moot. In all photography, even analogue, the picture subject must go through some type of medium before reaching us. In this way, even if the source was real, the photo result is already different. Editing or producing photographs digitally is no different that using shooting analogue photos different settings to capture a certain mood. Still a good article though, thanks.

]]>
Thomas May Photography It's an interesting point. That a photograph has to represent a "real" interaction with real light at some real point. ... It's an interesting point. That a photograph has to represent a "real" interaction with real light at some real point. ...