<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.0.2" -->
<rss version="2.0" 
    xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd" 
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Web 2.0&#8230;We Respond To We/sch</title>
	<link>http://writerresponsetheory.org/wordpress/2007/02/16/web-20we-respond-to-wesch/</link>
	<description>a blog and podcast dedicated to discussing text arts forms</description>
	<pubDate>Thu, 20 Nov 2008 10:01:35 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.0.2</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	
	 <copyright>Writer Response Theory 2004-2005</copyright>
    <managingEditor>wrt@writerresponsetheory.org (Writer Response Theory)</managingEditor>
    <webMaster>wrt@writerresponsetheory.org</webMaster>

    <category>Talk Radio</category>
   <itunes:category text="Arts &amp; Entertainment" ><itunes:category text="Entertainment" />
</itunes:category>
<itunes:category text="Education" ><itunes:category text="Higher Education" />
</itunes:category>
<itunes:category text="Technology" ><itunes:category text="Developers" />
</itunes:category>
	
    <itunes:subtitle>Comment-cast: Web 2.0&#8230;We Respond To We/sch</itunes:subtitle>
    <itunes:summary>Comment-cast: Web 2.0&#8230;We Respond To We/sch</itunes:summary>
    
    <itunes:author>Writer Response Theory</itunes:author>    
    <itunes:owner>
        <itunes:name>Writer Response Theory</itunes:name>
        <itunes:email>wrt@writerresponsetheory.org</itunes:email>
    </itunes:owner>
    
    <itunes:image href="http://writerresponsetheory.org/wordpress/wp-content/uploads/iTWRTl.JPG" />
    

	<item>
		<title>by: Fields</title>
		<link>http://writerresponsetheory.org/wordpress/2007/02/16/web-20we-respond-to-wesch/#comment-32645</link>
		<pubDate>Mon, 12 Mar 2007 10:26:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://writerresponsetheory.org/wordpress/2007/02/16/web-20we-respond-to-wesch/#comment-32645</guid>
					<description>At that point the trade-off is clear, we give up the fluidity of the pencil on the surface of the blank page for the fluidity of moving via hyperlinks from the written page before us to another written page located anywhere, the sequence no longer bound by the spine of a book.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>At that point the trade-off is clear, we give up the fluidity of the pencil on the surface of the blank page for the fluidity of moving via hyperlinks from the written page before us to another written page located anywhere, the sequence no longer bound by the spine of a book.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			                <itunes:author>Fields</itunes:author>
        <itunes:subtitle>At that point the trade-off is clear, we give up the fluidity of the pencil on the surface of the ...</itunes:subtitle>
        <itunes:summary>At that point the trade-off is clear, we give up the fluidity of the pencil on the surface of the ...</itunes:summary>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
